What rights did Obama take away? Start here
Glen Hook | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 11 years, 10 months AGO
I do not know Mr. Wes Higgins and doubt we could have a meaningful discussion, but in his last letter he challenged any one to name even one right Obama had taken away from us.
Well, sir, one right he took was the right to choose if one wanted health insurance or not, and what type you want. All this talk about women’s rights to do what they choose with their bodies, the same should apply to men. Worse yet, my agent and my wife are required to pay for a policy that now costs $200 a month more because Obama says they need pregnancy, pediatric dental and birth control coverage even though they can no longer bear children.
But the biggest right he has taken is the right to peace of mind when you have to fear the IRS, EPA, the invasion of our country from the South, the murder of our agents by criminals that our government has given the weapons to, and all this from a president who swore to uphold and defend the Constitution while at the same time he treats it like toilet paper.
Worst of all, if his policies are not reversed, he has taken the rights of our grandchildren to grow up and live the kind of lives you and I have enjoyed and so many have sacrificed and died for. May God Bless America again. —Glen Hook, Kalispell
ARTICLES BY GLEN HOOK
Commissioners should try to keep patio on building
I believe that an outdoor patio at the new South Campus building, which was recently cut from the county project, would not only benefit seniors during meal service during warmer weather, but also county employees and guests for socialization.
Glad the crime did not result in death
I just read the letters to the editor in the March 16 paper, and felt I must add my voice.
Atheist writer's argument doubted
Having read Mr. Wackrow’s letter of May 11 several times, I have to think even rational atheists would not agree with him. Maybe one could think that the Supreme Court’s decision on invocations could be endorsing Christianity, but on the other hand one could just as well see it as a decision that it just does not violate the Constitution, period.