Sunday, May 24, 2026
44.0°F

Glad the crime did not result in death

Glen Hook | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 12 years, 2 months AGO
by Glen Hook
| March 22, 2014 9:00 PM

I just read the letters to the editor in the March 16 paper, and felt I must add my voice.

What a deplorable act against the health-care facility. I can’t imagine how the owner must feel violated and personally destroyed along with the loss of her property. I myself don’t for the most part agree that abortions should be performed except in incidents of rape or incest or to save the mother’s life, but in no way do I believe  this crime was committed out of moral outrage against abortion.

If the person accused of this crime was carrying a fully loaded semi automatic pistol with one in the chamber and a spare loaded magazine plus other weapons, surely he would have been prepared to do a lot more than wreck a building. Thank God there was not a cleaning person there or the owner going over records. In my opinion, it would could very likely have ended with injury or a loss of life. In the end, only things were destroyed and things can be replaced, whereas a life cannot. We should all be grateful for that.

One other thing: This crime (and I lay no fault on law enforcement) was committed perhaps a block and a half or two from the police station, so don’t ever be lulled into thinking they can protect you; all they can do is investigate, write up a report and hope to catch the criminal.

Hook is a resident of Kalispell

ARTICLES BY GLEN HOOK

January 29, 2015 7:58 p.m.

Commissioners should try to keep patio on building

I believe that an outdoor patio at the new South Campus building, which was recently cut from the county project, would not only benefit seniors during meal service during warmer weather, but also county employees and guests for socialization. 

March 22, 2014 9 p.m.

Glad the crime did not result in death

I just read the letters to the editor in the March 16 paper, and felt I must add my voice.

June 25, 2014 8 p.m.

Atheist writer's argument doubted

Having read Mr. Wackrow’s letter of May 11 several times, I have to think even rational atheists would not agree with him. Maybe one could think that the Supreme Court’s decision on invocations could be endorsing Christianity, but on the other hand one could just as well see it as a decision that it just does not violate the Constitution, period.