Lawmakers seek to delist gray wolf
CHRIS PETERSON | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 14 years, 7 months AGO
Chris Peterson is the editor of the Hungry Horse News. He covers Columbia Falls, the Canyon, Glacier National Park and the Bob Marshall Wilderness. All told, about 4 million acres of the best parts of the planet. He can be reached at editor@hungryhorsenews.com or 406-892-2151. | August 19, 2010 11:00 PM
Montana Congressman Denny Rehberg said he plans to co-sponsor legislation that will remove the gray wolf from Endangered Species Act protection.
The bill, introduced by Congressman Chet Edwards of Texas, amends the ESA to specifically exclude wolves from protection.
"The gray wolf (Canis lupus' shall not be treated as an endangered species or threatened species for purposes of this Act," the amendment reads.
"It's become clear the courts and the environmental extremists have abandoned the principle of sound science when determining the status of the gray wolf," Rehberg said last week. "Years of research, dedicated efforts by land owners and local officials, and the expert opinions of on-the-ground wildlife managers have been given a back seat to profit-motivated environmental groups. We need to call attention to this abuse and solve an issue that should have been put to rest years ago."
The legislation comes on the heels of a federal court ruling earlier this month that placed wolves in Montana and Idaho back on the ESA. The U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service broke its own rulemaking process when it de-listed wolves in Montana and Idaho, but not Wyoming.
The court said the Service had to take all three states into account. The Service did not delist wolves in Wyoming because the state did not devise an acceptable management plan that would preserve its wolf population outside Yellowstone National Park.
Montana Sen. Max Baucus said he'll also introduce legislation that will put wolves under Montana management.
"We've got to manage them," he said. "I disagree with Judge Molloy's decision. There are 500 wolves in Montana. Scientists say if there are 100 wolves, the species is protected. I think there should be a wolf hunt. They're cutting down elk and deer populations. Hunters are upset and livestock managers are worried about predation."
Meanwhile the state may pursue other avenues to control Montana's wolf population.
One tack involves utilizing a section in the ESA known as the 10-J rule that would allow government hunters to shoot wolves that are causing depredations in game herds. The 10-J rule would only apply to the "experimental" population of wolves in the southern half of the state. Those wolves were re-introduced in the 1990s by the USFWS. Wolves in Northwest Montana, however, naturally expanded their range from Canada, initially forming packs in Glacier National Park in the mid-1980s.
Another strategy is to appeal Molloy's ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
All of the strategies take months, if not years, notes Carolyn Sime, wolf program coordinator for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Ultimately, FWP would like to have sportsmen harvest animals through a controlled hunting season, she said.
MORE IMPORTED STORIES
State and federal legislation aims at delisting wolves
Bigfork Eagle | Updated 14 years, 2 months ago
ARTICLES BY CHRIS PETERSON

Glacier National Park's Sun Road advanced reservations easier to get than one might think
The earlier morning hour slot — from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.— as one might expect, are going much faster. But in early July, it doesn’t get dark until well after 10 p.m. in Glacier, so even starting out at 1 p.m. gives a party plenty of daylight to enjoy the park.

Eagles in distress or just in love? We’ll never know
When Anne Scott-Markle heard a bald eagle flapping in a big ponderosa pine near her rural Columbia Falls home last Thursday, she thought something may have been amiss.

CRMP Comments: Many folks want more river protections, not less
The proposed action for the Comprehensive River Management plan for the three forks of the Flathead River drew 1,241 comments. Some common themes have emerged, as many people urged the Forest Service and Park Service to consider the health of the rivers, fish and wildlife more, not less, particularly in wilderness areas like the South Fork of the Flathead in the Bob Marshall Wilderness and the Middle Fork in the Great Bear Wilderness.