Time to pick on pronouns

Mrs. Language Person, that pathetic word nerd, has been known to make mistakes; but never, never with pronouns. In fact, when she hears, "Me and him are going..." or "It was fun for her and I," your MLP gets that spine-shattering feeling like the screech of nails on a chalkboard (not that chalkboards exist anymore, sniff sniff).

So away we go: Pronouns as subjects, direct objects, and indirect objects. Him and he. She and her. Them and they. I and me. Who and whom.

The concept is so simple that MLP wonders if we just don't remember the little trick. How does one know which to use? Simple Simon says, "Mentally separate into two sentences." For example, with subject pronouns, "(She/her) and (He/him) use correct grammar" would become, "She uses correct grammar," and "He uses..."

Would you say that him uses it? Of course not. So why say "Her and Him use?" Neither does me go to the store. I go to the store; so do they and I (go to the store). In other words, if the pronoun is the subject of the sentence, the correct choices are subject pronouns - I, she, he, they and who. Once the sentence is completed in the mind, separately for each pronoun, the choice becomes more obvious.

Now consider the example of renaming, and note: It doesn't change a thing. A subject by any other name remains so. How's this for a triple-whammy: "Is it he who edits this column?" Again, separate and find out. "It is (who edits this column)," "He is (or he edits)" and "Who is" all fit perfectly as the three substitutable subjects in the sentence, therefore they (snuck in another subject pronoun!) are all correct choices.

So much for subjects. For pronouns as objects of a verb or preposition (direct or indirect) - me, her, him, them, and whom - a similar trick may be used, although it may require mental insertion of an omitted word, such as "of" or "for." More on that in a moment.

If MLP annoys her readers, she drives them crazy. She couldn't drive they crazy, could she? They may be driven crazy, but "she" (subject) drives "them" (object) bonkers. Call it a pronoun role reversal for direct objects of the verb, "drive." To whom may I turn for answers to grammar questions? Mr. Johnson, that's who (but he's also to whom I must turn; whom is the object of to).

Sorry; couldn't resist that one. One could argue "that's who," because "who" renames Mr. Johnson as subject of the sentence, but the second example is "to whom," because whom is the object of "may turn." However, had I answered, "It is Mr. Johnson to whom I must turn," well, you see the difference is that magic word "to." Yes, I know; horrid example. Simple Simon, go stuff yourself.

Since the topic is still fresh on our minds, "Who did you vote for?" just doesn't cut the mustard. "For whom did you vote?" is much better. No, don't answer that, but you get the idea; if you can precede it with "to," "for" or another preposition, it's whom. And her, them, him, and me, a.k.a. object pronouns.

With indirect objects, the preposition isn't always visible. If they're in hiding, mentally finish the understood phrase. "Nigel sent her an angry letter." See the understood "to," following sent (to)? The letter went to her. "Her" is the object of "to," or "sent to."

A little tougher are "than" and "as," but the same imaginary completion trick works, generally by adding the hidden verb. "He is smarter than she (is)." "Sholeh isn't as good a writer as (are) they."

That's as good a reminder as any that it's time to quit. Next time MLP addresses common mistakes with subject-verb agreement, as well as verbs disguised as adjectives or adverbs. Even words like to play dress-up.

Sholeh Patrick is a columnist for the Hagadone News Network. Contact her at [email protected]