Thursday, January 23, 2025
21.0°F

EPA's proposed 'waters' rule is unreasonable

Bob Stallman | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 9 months AGO
by Bob Stallman
| April 2, 2014 8:01 AM

Last week, the American Farm Bureau Federation carefully reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency’s March 25 release of the “waters of the U.S.” proposed rule. The results of our review are dismaying.

The EPA proposal poses a serious threat to farmers, ranchers and other landowners. Under EPA’s proposed new rule, waters — even ditches — are regulated even if they are miles from the nearest “navigable” waters.

Indeed, so-called “waters” are regulated even if they aren’t wet most of the time. EPA says its new rule will reduce uncertainty, and that much seems to be true — there isn’t much uncertainty if most every feature where water flows or stands after a rainfall is federally regulated.

Under this proposed rule, farmers, ranchers and every other landowner across the countryside will face a tremendous new roadblock to ordinary land use activities. This is not just about the paperwork of getting a permit to farm, or even about having farming practices regulated.

The fact is there is no legal right to a Clean Water Act permit — if farming or ranching activities need a permit, EPA or the Army Corps of Engineers can deny that permit. That’s why Clean Water Act jurisdiction over farmlands amounts to nothing less than federal veto power over a farmer’s ability to farm.

EPA accompanied its proposal with a new “interpretive rule” claiming to clarify certain statutory exemptions for agricultural conservation practices, including activities as commonplace and essential to farming as building a fence.

But these exemptions apply only to “dredge and fill” permit requirements. They do not protect farmers from federal veto power over pest and weed control, fertilizer application and other essential farming activities that may result in the addition of “pollutants” to “navigable waters” — providing one views every ditch and wet spot across the landscape as “navigable waters.”

The American Farm Bureau Federation will dedicate itself to opposing this attempted end run around the limits set by Congress and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that Congress meant what it said — “navigable waters” does not mean all waters. This proposed rule shows that EPA refuses to accept those limits.

Bob Stallman is the president of the American Farm Bureau Federation.

MORE IMPORTED STORIES

EPA's proposed 'waters' rule is unreasonable
Hungry Horse News | Updated 10 years, 9 months ago
New EPA water rules are complicated
Bigfork Eagle | Updated 10 years, 6 months ago
New EPA water rules are complicated
Hungry Horse News | Updated 10 years, 6 months ago

ARTICLES BY BOB STALLMAN

September 16, 2014 8:25 a.m.

Harvest 2014: A bounty of rewards and challenges

Harvest season is upon us, bringing with it that perfect blend of sunshine, crisp air and golden fields. While it is a farmer’s nature, it is harder for many of us to complain about the weather we have enjoyed this summer.

April 2, 2014 8:01 a.m.

EPA's proposed 'waters' rule is unreasonable

Last week, the American Farm Bureau Federation carefully reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency’s March 25 release of the “waters of the U.S.” proposed rule. The results of our review are dismaying.

March 6, 2014 6:22 a.m.

Biotechnology and coexistence

The American Farm Bureau Federation supports the Agriculture Department’s decision to move forward with an important recommendation about biotechnology and coexistence. That recommendation, from the final report of the Advisory Committee on Biotechnology & 21st Century Agriculture (AC21), is to foster communication and collaboration to strengthen coexistence among farmers.