So we are paying them to take away our water rights?
Mark Agather | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 9 months AGO
“You say the Indian Water Compact requires Montanans to pay the Indians $55 million to take our water. Don’t you mean instead that the Indians are paying the state of Montana $55 million for our water rights?”
“No,” the legislator supporting the compact replied, “the Indians get $55 million to ‘implement’ the conditions of the water compact, which means taking our water.”
I sat stunned as the meaning of these statements sunk into my consciousness. I said “No one in their right mind would vote for such a farce.”
“Oh no”, this gentleman went on to say, “in fact, there will be other ongoing payments to the Indians as well.” My mind reeled as I considered how such ridiculousness could ever be seriously considered by our elected officials.
Changing to another point, I said “Do you realize the Indians are using a hammer to herd our citizens into support for this legislation? They are threatening the citizens of our state by saying they would initiate 10,000 lawsuits, all funded by the federal government, against every irrigator or other major water user ‘forever’ until they get what they want. No wonder we have so many water rights holders clamoring for the compact which supposedly guarantees their water rights even if it is only for a few years.”
I continued by asking the legislator I was talking to if he had ever considered voting for the citizens of the state of Montana instead of the Indians and the federal government. Incredulous, he asked me what I meant.
I said why not vote against the compact and, in addition, vote for another bill which would set aside $55 million as a defense fund for all water users in the state and for our future generations as well to fight this illegal water (and private property) grab.
“Better yet,” I suggested, “set the money aside for a class-action lawsuit for all the citizens of the state. After all, it is their money and, in reality, you wouldn’t be spending an extra cent relative to what you are giving away in the compact. If you did put up this money for our citizens it would even up the fight now funded so liberally by the federal government, which is the real entity making this grab for our assets. Also, by taking the onus of the defense costs off of our water users, you could give them the ability to analyze the true impact of the compact without this gun pointed at their heads”.
He stared at me blankly as this concept penetrated. It was a frightening situation for him because he realized the fact that this vote on the compact was truly a fight for the future of Montana for all time — in reality, a vote for Montanans instead of the Indians and the federal government.
That, my friends, is the real issue.
Agather is a resident of Kalispell
MORE IMPORTED STORIES
ARTICLES BY MARK AGATHER
CSKT water compact questions need answering
Sen. Bruce Tutvedt’s most recent letter to the editor brings nothing new to the table and, as usual, ignores the vast majority of the real questions relevant to the issue of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes water compact.
Demand sanity from the Forest Service
Don’t be fooled by the AP article on smoke from Western wildfires, which attributes more smoke in our region to “climate change” (whatever that is). In reality, the cause is the poor management practices of the Forest Service relative to our forests who fail to realize that first and foremost, there must be a commitment to put the fires out immediately. There is no such thing as “managing” a forest fire.
The green agenda and government control
It’s getting colder out year by year, I told my astonished friend. On top of that, the Antarctic ice sheet is setting records for increase and even the Arctic ice sheet has grown significantly since it’s low point as measured in 2012. His reply of “ridiculous” had to be modified later after he reviewed a series of articles, I supplied him from credible sources (NOAA, NASA) confirming my statements.