Thursday, January 23, 2025
3.0°F

Whitefish should get its just deserts

Russell Crowder | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 5 months AGO
by Russell Crowder
| August 7, 2014 8:27 PM

In regard to a recent Daily Inter Lake editorial on the Montana Supreme Court’s Whitefish “doughnut” ruling, I was extremely amused by the following statement: “Understandably, city officials say they hope they will be influential as the county moves forward with doughnut oversight, and they arguably should be.”

This from a local government controlled by a now “radicalized” Democrat Party that successfully resisted for years the pleas of county property owners, taxpayers and citizens that their “right to representation” be recognized.

Hey Whitefish, in regard to the doughnut areas surrounding your fair National Socialist Utopia, many of us agree that this should be the county’s response to such a ludicrous suggestion: “No Representation!” —Russell Crowder, Marion

MORE IMPORTED STORIES

Doughnut dispute is finally over
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 10 years, 6 months ago
Whitefish has no one to blame but itself
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 10 years, 5 months ago
County should move forward with planning for doughnut
Hungry Horse News | Updated 11 years, 4 months ago

ARTICLES BY RUSSELL CROWDER

September 16, 2010 11 p.m.

Why planning is a 'bad word'

Over the past several years in Flathead County, this failed and expensive experiment we call "planning" has led to dozens of lawsuits; the City of Whitefish and county government at each others throats; thousands of abandoned and disenfranchised citizens; ongoing attempts to regulate into extinction rural property ownership; numerous legally questionable new local government regulations denying property owners the lawful use of their property; and, on the county level, a legal 'settlement" that even by modest estimates chains taxpayers to several million dollars of debt.

September 16, 2010 11 p.m.

Why planning is a 'bad word'

Over the past several years in Flathead County, this failed and expensive experiment we call "planning" has led to dozens of lawsuits; the City of Whitefish and county government at each others throats; thousands of abandoned and disenfranchised citizens; ongoing attempts to regulate into extinction rural property ownership; numerous legally questionable new local government regulations denying property owners the lawful use of their property; and, on the county level, a legal 'settlement" that even by modest estimates chains taxpayers to several million dollars of debt.

September 16, 2010 11 p.m.

Why planning is a 'bad word'

Over the past several years in Flathead County, this failed and expensive experiment we call "planning" has led to dozens of lawsuits; the City of Whitefish and county government at each others throats; thousands of abandoned and disenfranchised citizens; ongoing attempts to regulate into extinction rural property ownership; numerous legally questionable new local government regulations denying property owners the lawful use of their property; and, on the county level, a legal 'settlement" that even by modest estimates chains taxpayers to several million dollars of debt.