Sunday, January 19, 2025
10.0°F

'They're not going to restart CFAC'

Richard Hanners | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 11 months AGO
by Richard Hanners
| January 30, 2014 8:00 PM

Union officials representing workers laid off at Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. say they’ve maintained their silence long enough about the future of the plant.

Former Aluminum Workers Trades Council president Dave Toavs and Steelworkers Local 320 President Brian Doyle are pessimistic about the plant ever functioning again and frustrated by the machinations of CFAC owner Glencore, a giant international commodities trading company based in Switzerland.

“They’re not going to restart CFAC,” Toavs said. “It’s done.”

“One thing — if they do restart it, I don’t want to be out there,” Doyle said. “It’s become too dangerous.”

Doyle said he and Toavs have been working behind the scenes for a long time, talking to U.S. Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester in an effort to get the plant restarted.

“A lot of this is not publicly known,” Doyle said. “We want to disclose everything now.”

Toavs, who resigned as Trades Council president when he went to work for BNSF Railway and is now the union’s vice president, said about 230 people are on the union’s list of workers laid off between 2006 and 2009.

The council represents CFAC workers who belong to the Steelworkers and Teamsters and various craft unions for electricians, millwrights, pipefitters, mechanics and ironworkers. The council’s contract with Glencore was extended in 2011 and will expire in October 2014, Toavs said.

 Columbia Falls Aluminum has faced hard times since the West Coast energy crisis shut down the plant entirely in 2001, including a variety of curtailments until the plant shut down completely for the last time in October 2009.

“The workers did whatever they could to keep the plant running up to then,” Toavs said. “They worked their butts off — on a shoestring maintenance budget but with the best managers we’ve seen in three years.”

“It wasn’t just the union workers,” Doyle added. “Management was right alongside us.”

Glencore cited unfavorable market prices for electrical power, raw materials and finished metal for the shut down. So Trades Council officials were surprised to learn Glencore turned down a five-year power contract offer from the Bonneville Power Administration in December 2010.

“They don’t like to talk publicly about this offer,” Toavs explained, noting it was different from a later BPA offer.

“It was a Cadillac of contracts, with no penalties for curtailments or other problems,” Doyle said. “A former BPA guy I spoke with said he’d never heard of such a sweet deal.”

“And the metals market was good at the time,” Toavs added. “The ingot price for aluminum went to $2,800 a tonne in 2011. That would have made Glencore enough to run the plant for years.”

Toavs credited the work of Baucus and Tester in getting the BPA offer.

After Glencore turned it down, Toavs sent Glencore an “effects bargaining” letter asking the company to sit down and talk about a severance for CFAC’s laid-off workers.

Trades Council’ officers spent hours researching a severance package and Baucus and Tester support it, Toavs said.

“They said Glencore needs to step up to the plate and talk to the unions,” Toavs said.

Toavs and Doyle say they continued to work behind the scenes to help get the plant started, but each time they sent Glencore another “effects bargaining” letter, Matt Lucke, the company’s top aluminum manager for the U.S., told them the plant would be restarting.

“Glencore kept stringing us along,” Toavs said.

Talks with Lucke had their odd moments.

Toavs recalled a conference call in 2010 where he told Lucke about the importance of having experienced and skilled workers at CFAC.

“’What do you think we are, a bunch of hillbillies, and we’ll all go to our cabins and wait for a start-up call?’” Toavs said he told him. “And he replied, ‘Unemployment is so high in the Flathead that Glencore would have no trouble finding workers.’”

Doyle recalled talking to Glencore about a severance in 2010 and warning about the good relations Trades Council had with Baucus and Tester.

“And Lucke replied, ‘I don’t think those clowns have the clout you think they have,’” Doyle said.

Doyle noted that Glencore had asked the union on several occasions to talk to Baucus and Tester about helping the plant restart.

“By then, Glencore had already burned its bridges with Baucus and Tester,” Doyle said.

Some of the Trades Council talks with Lucke had less to do with a restart and more to do with a potentially expensive cleanup.

“Once in 2010, Lucke offered the union a 15 percent profit-sharing deal,” Toavs said. “But when I asked him if they were thinking of restarting the plant, he said no, if the union had a stake in the plant, the government might go easier on them for a cleanup.”

Toavs said Lucke later asked if the Blackfeet Indian Tribe might be interested in a stake in CFAC for the same reason.

Baucus and Tester had persuaded officials at the White House in 2013 to speak directly with Glencore about CFAC.

“Glencore’s response was, one, they didn’t know where Columbia Falls was, and two, they didn’t own an aluminum smelter in Columbia Falls,” Toavs said. “The conversation ended after that.”

 In April 2013, Lucke and two other Glencore officials, Patrick Wilson and Zach Meyer, came to the Flathead and invited Trades Council officials to meet at the plant.

“We thought there would be good news,” Doyle said.

“But they told us the reason they came here was to meet with the county commissioners and Columbia Falls City Council and repair their tarnished reputation,” Toavs said. “They asked us to go with them and say how well Glencore had treated us.”

Toavs said he asked Wilson to name one thing Glencore had done for the workers.

“He said they paid for our health insurance,” Toavs said. “I said, no, we paid for COBRA and Glencore only paid what was required by law. Wilson shut up after that.”

Health insurance was a sore point with Toavs. He recalled one union worker, facing a choice between house payments or keeping his health insurance for his wife, coming to him shortly after the plant closed in 2009 asking for help.

“I called Lucke and asked if Glencore could keep paying for health insurance for the laid-off workers for three more months,” Toavs said. “He said, ‘We’re bleeding too badly, and don’t call me back again.’ I didn’t. He later called me.”

In August 2013, Glencore paid for an audit on CFAC’s salvage value. Not long after that, a group from China came to look over the plant.

“Back in 2009, we had talked about converting the gutted West Plant into a modern prebake smelter, and we thought we could get federal stimulus money for the conversion,” Toavs said. “But the Chinese said no, tear down the entire plant and rebuild it. It was another dog-and-pony show.”

In December 2013, personnel from Century Aluminum, a Glencore holding company, came to CFAC to see there was anything worth taking back to their Midwest smelters.

Hanners is the editor of the Hungry Horse News.

MORE IMPORTED STORIES

Union rep says Rehberg wouldn't help CFAC restart
Hungry Horse News | Updated 12 years, 2 months ago
Union rep says Rehberg wouldn't help CFAC restart
Whitefish Pilot | Updated 12 years, 2 months ago
Time to hold Glencore accountable
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 10 years, 11 months ago

ARTICLES BY RICHARD HANNERS

August 17, 2005 11 p.m.

CFAC's history an interesting journey

The Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. has an interesting and fascinating past. Spurred in part by the creation of the Hungry Horse Dam, CFAC was an idea whose time had come.

March 23, 2005 10 p.m.

Electric fence planned for spill

Hungry Horse News

September 8, 2004 11 p.m.

Neighborhood planning in jeopardy

North Forkers who have been told by the Flathead County Planning Office that they need to update their neighborhood plans may not be alone.