Friday, November 15, 2024
28.0°F

Agency wants partial Whitefish River closure

MATT BALDWIN | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 5 months AGO
by MATT BALDWIN
Matt Baldwin is regional editor for Hagadone Media Montana. He is a graduate of the University of Montana's School of Journalism. He can be reached at 406-758-4447 or mbaldwin@dailyinterlake.com. | June 10, 2014 9:00 PM

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks is proposing a compromise that will allow motorized boats continued access to the Whitefish River at least part of the year.

Fish, Wildlife and Parks officials propose a seasonal closure to motorboats from July 5 to Sept. 30. State officials say that is a better alternative than the year-round nonmotorized restriction proposed by the city of Whitefish.

The state Fish and Wildlife Commission will consider the river question Thursday in Helena.

The city passed a resolution in November that aims to restrict the Whitefish River to electric motors or manually powered vessels from the BNSF train trestle to the JP Road bridge. A no-wake restriction on that stretch of river has been in place since 1989.

The city argues a nonmotorized waterway will help address resource damage and safety issues. They also say its in alignment with the social desires of the community to create a unique place for nonmotorized recreation — such as paddleboarding, kayaking, canoeing — away from Whitefish Lake.

Local Fish, Wildlife and Parks officials took public comment on the nonmotorized proposal at an April meeting where 36 people spoke in favor of the project and six were opposed. They also received 168 written comments with 69 in support and 99 against.

In its recommendation, Fish, Wildlife and Parks says the current no-wake rule limits resource damage, keeps the river safe, maintains the historic use of motorized boats and provides a good alternative for nonmotorized and small vessels.

“However, given the split in public comment and support for the proposed restriction, FWP feels a seasonal closure ... is a better alternative,” the state agency notes.

“This addresses public comment by allowing anglers the opportunity to fish in the spring, residents can boat upstream to watch the fireworks on July 4, waterfowl hunters can motor back upstream in the fall while at the same time providing the warm summer months for nonmotorized/electric motor use when the majority of people engage in these activities.”

Fish, Wildlife and Parks goes on to note there are three spots along the river where motorboats have difficulty traveling upstream while maintaining no-wake speeds. They suggest motorboats be allowed to travel at the “minimum operating speed necessary to progress upstream.”

A similar rule is in place along the Swan River.

Fish, Wildlife and Parks is asking the commission to extend public comment to further analyze the proposed seasonal closure.

Baldwin is the editor of the Whitefish Pilot.

ARTICLES BY