Wednesday, January 22, 2025
23.0°F

Water compact debate brings out true colors

Clarice Ryan | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years, 2 months AGO
by Clarice Ryan
| November 12, 2014 1:50 PM

The debate over the Federal Reserved Water rights for the CSKT reservation has brought out the true character of individuals and groups involved.  The historic purpose of the reservation is established fact:  Provision of a home for Indians which had merit at the time, and of course required inclusion of water essential to life.  However, the current over-reach of state and federal governments in the proposed compact extends far beyond reservation boundaries to the extent of management and control of all Montana waters west of the Continental Divide.

  Polling places on Indian trust parcels lack oversight and enforcement by the Secretary of State.  There may be as many as 75 polling precincts on the seven reservations in Montana.  This can significantly alter election results as tribal governments have no duty to provide a list of tribal identification cards. There is no way to verify one person, one vote at polling precincts on Indian trust lands.

In the past the Montana vote has managed to upset party balance at the national level to the extent that it significantly altered federal decision-making and policies.

—Clarice Ryan, Bigfork

 

MORE IMPORTED STORIES

Water compact debate brings out true colors
Hungry Horse News | Updated 10 years, 2 months ago
CSKT water compact shouldn't be taken lightly
Hungry Horse News | Updated 10 years ago
CSKT water compact shouldn't be taken lightly
Bigfork Eagle | Updated 10 years ago

ARTICLES BY CLARICE RYAN

November 25, 2018 1 a.m.

Protecting the environment through capitalism

Mineral, lumber or plastic. It’s all about use and handling of materials found in nature.

January 29, 2017 1 a.m.

'Million-woman mob scene' is symptom of deeper woes

A lot was going on behind the elaborate presidential inauguration in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile an undercurrent and display of public reaction was churning. We are now witnessing the preliminary scenario of the upcoming Trump administration. Unfortunately strength draws arrows and stimulates animosity. Increasing divisiveness is fomenting under a pervasive wave of persecution complex. The follow-up million-woman march was an outgrowth of women’s causes and emotions. But also on display were “poverty” concerns and “racial” sensitivity shared by slave and Indian descendants, as well as current immigrants.

June 4, 2017 2 a.m.

National-monument decrees are way to control public lands

We should all respect and treasure history. We must preserve our past and the artifacts from historic times. The Antiquities Act established by President Theodore Roosevelt simply requires presidential signature to declare national monuments as opposed to congressional action required for a national park. In more recent years such locations as historic buildings or battlefields have expanded to protections of entire scenic landscapes of federally held lands. There is now question of original intent.