Misunderstandings surround Montana banking law
Sen. Eric Moore | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 10 months AGO
Banks can be like doctors and lawyers; people cuss them until they need one. As a lifelong farmer and rancher, I depend on them to supply the operating capital my business needs to function, provide jobs and pay taxes. Over 25 years, I have learned that through good times and bad, timely and candid communication between lenders and borrowers is critical to beneficial outcomes.
Recently, I introduced a bill in the Montana Legislature that seeks to remedy a perhaps unintended consequence of a recent Montana Supreme Court decision. In a case that dealt with bad faith in a home mortgage loan, the court stated that oral discussions between a lender and borrower could be used as grounds for a lawsuit.
This just makes no sense. I know Montanans like to do business on a handshake, but the reality is that when you get a mortgage, car loan or operating loan, you get it in writing. When you agree to modify that loan agreement, you should also get it in writing. Common sense.
Leaving trial lawyers the opportunity to sue on a “he said, she said” basis has potentially disastrous consequences. Bankers don’t like being sued any more than you do, so their lawyers will instruct their loan officers to not talk to their clients. When you lose your job, get hurt, are fighting drought or low markets, you need to be able to sit down and talk to your lender about options. Communication is vital.
Despite some recent misinformation in the press, Senate Bill 280 is very simple. By requiring any loan modification agreements to be in writing, it protects both the consumer and the lender, and preserves open communication necessary to healthy business relationships.
What the bill does not do is: 1) Effect any current litigation, 2) Impede consumer rights under federal laws like SAFE or Dodd-Frank, 3) Overturn the Morrow case, or 4) Protect banks, small or large, from acts of fraud or bad faith.
Another thing to keep in mind is that the big multinational banks have swarms of corporate attorneys and compliance officers to navigate through state and federal red tape. Your local home town bank does not. Every time the legislature or courts hand down another banking regulation, we encourage another small town bank to be swallowed by a corporate. This destroys competition and diminishes customer service.
Montana is blessed to have a healthy economy right now. Let’s not strangle the flow of capital to homeowners and job creators through foolish regulation.
Sen. Eric Moore, R–Miles City, is a farmer and feedlot operator and serves as Senate President Pro-Tempore for the 64th Montana Legislature.
ARTICLES BY SEN. ERIC MOORE
Where is Gov. Bullock on energy?
Why has Montana Gov. Steve Bullock gone mute on the important issues facing Montana’s energy economy? Energy jobs are critically important to the economic well being of all parts of the state, east and west, and are a vital pillar to our tax base. Our vast energy resources hold the potential for an economic boost in our state that no other sector can currently replicate.
Policy not politics should fuel public land debate
As avid sportsmen, we recognize the value of our public land in Montana. But we also recognize our responsibility as citizens to see that our public lands are properly managed. It’s simply not enough to just “keep it public.”
Misunderstandings surround Montana banking law
Banks can be like doctors and lawyers; people cuss them until they need one. As a lifelong farmer and rancher, I depend on them to supply the operating capital my business needs to function, provide jobs and pay taxes. Over 25 years, I have learned that through good times and bad, timely and candid communication between lenders and borrowers is critical to beneficial outcomes.