Skeptical and confused over healthcare laws
Jim Elliott | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 10 years AGO
In addition to Medicare I have a very generous employer’s retiree healthcare insurance policy which covers virtually any condition or procedure I can imagine needing. Of course, to enjoy this generous plan I also pay a generous premium, so, this being only time of year you can change health plans, I thought I would look into saving myself some money and began to shop around. Now I wish I hadn’t bothered. I had assumed I could understand the difference between health insurance policies but I now realize that there are people who make a good salary making sure that 99.99 percent of the American public, including myself, can’t understand them. And I’m not even talking about Medicare, that I can understand. I am talking about the good old American way of doing business, the private marketplace.
First, I discovered that Medicare Advantage plans do not cover the costs that Medicare doesn’t. In fact, it seems some of them are more restrictive, so why they are called “Advantage” is beyond me. What I wanted was a Medicare Supplement plan, and what I found out is that only certain plans are available for certain zip codes. If I enter the zip code where I live, I get to choose from 7 plans, but if I enter the zip code of the place I do business I could choose from 14 plans.
In the handy-dandy Medicare.gov “plan finder” I am asked if I want drug coverage, and if so, what drugs am I taking. I list them, and Medicare.com tells me that they would cost me about $8,000 a year if I bought them on my own, without insurance coverage. This is interesting, because when I check with a pharmacy they tell me that it will cost me about $700 a year. Even more interesting is that the lowest cost drug plan I can find will cost me $1,100 a year, including premiums, co-pays, co-insurance, co-this’n’that, and co-baloney.
When I look for a Medicare Supplement plan I have only to compare, side-by-side, seven plans in addition to my own, to see which covers what, and when. This is too mystifying. If I use one of my tried and true decision making techniques based on the principle that “quality costs less” even if the initial cost is more, I will choose the most expensive plan I can find. OK, that’s the plan I am now on. But if I want to settle for second best I could save around $2,000 a year. It all depends on the fine print.
Remember the advice to always read the fine print? Take my word for it, the way these things are written they can confuse you just as easil with print the size of the first line on the eye chart.
At this point I am beginning to wonder if it is not worth paying the extra $2,000 a year to not be confused. I know there is a State Health Insurance Assistance Program that I can call for help, and I will, but I’m still skeptical—and confused.
Jim Elliott served 16 years in the Montana Legislature as a representative and senator. He lives in Trout Creek.
ARTICLES BY JIM ELLIOTT
Compromise for the common good
Representative Justin Amash, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, may be the most principled man in American politics. Unfortunately, he is most likely going to wind up in the ash bin of principled politicians, most of whom sacrifice their career and their influence for the small pleasure of being able to sleep well at night. Amash recently left the Republican Party to become an Independent.
America's working people finally get attention
If you want to get the attention of the powers that be, you have to do something radical to call attention to yourself. A couple of years ago working-class Americans did that by electing Donald Trump as president. It’s no surprise, anybody with eyes could have seen it coming, and maybe they did, but they didn’t do anything about it. From 2010 to 2013 the Association of Democratic State Chairs was regularly called to task by the Chair of the Wyoming Democrats for paying attention to every minority but working-class Americans. The Democrats didn’t want to hear it, but they have now.
Free lunch, not free enterprise
I suppose I shouldn’t be any more surprised than most taxpaying Americans to discover that I paid more in income taxes in 2018 than the behemoth retailer Amazon.com; but then I didn’t have a net profit of $11.2 billion, either. Nor did I get anything close to Amazon’s $128 million tax refund for 2018. This is the second consecutive year that Amazon has not paid federal income taxes. In 2017 it paid no taxes on an income of $5.6 billion. All this from the April 11, 2019 “Fortune” magazine which reported on research done by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.