ML School Board approves construction bond proposal including second high school
CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 8 months AGO
Breaking News
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | August 11, 2016 8:41 PM
MOSES LAKE — Moses Lake School District voters will be asked to approve or reject a construction bond for a new, second high school, a new elementary school and upgrades to the existing Moses Lake High School. The current cost estimate is $135.3 million, but Moses Lake School Board members Kevin Donovan and Eric Stones said they wanted the board and administration to look for ways to lower the cost.
The current bond proposal includes $111.4 million for the second high school, $19.5 million for a new elementary school and $13.8 million in upgrades to Moses Lake High School. The district is eligible for about $9.4 million from the state school construction fund. If the bond is approved, property owners would pay an estimated $1.44 per $1,000 of assessed property value. District superintendent Michelle Price said that’s just an estimate only. The actual assessment will depend district-wide property valuations.
The bond will go to voters Feb. 14.
Board members had their choice of two options, and chose the new high school in a vote at the regular meeting Thursday. Board members Susan Freeman, Oscar Ochoa and Vicki Groff voted in favor of building a new high school. Stones voted no, and had earlier expressed his support for the other option, remodeling Moses Lake High School to accommodate 2,500 students.
As board chair, Donovan called for the vote. After it passed, Groff asked Donovan if he wanted to go on record. Donovan said it passed so he didn’t need to go on record. “I will support whatever bond proposal we as a board decide on, and we as a board just decided on option No. 1.”
Donovan said he thought a second high school was “a great idea,” but that he was concerned voters would think the price tag was too high. Because the bond is a revenue measure, it requires approval from 60 percent of the voters to pass. The district offered a bond for a new high school in 2015; it received 54 percent of the vote.
ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER
Moses Lake Grange to sponsor candidate forum
MOSES LAKE — The Moses Lake Grange No. 1151 will sponsor a forum where people can listen to candidates for the Fourth Congressional District from 3 to 5 p.m. May 9 at the Grange building, 14724 Road 3 SE.
Ephrata to consider impact fees for new development
EPHRATA — The possibility of adding transportation and parks impact fees for new development will be under consideration by the Ephrata City Council, starting with a discussion April 29. Community Development Director Ron Sell said development fees would be a new thing for Ephrata. “Currently we don’t have any impact fees in place. We do have a parks mitigation fee in place,” Sell said.
Surveys of Moses Lake residents show attitudes toward service cuts, sales tax increase
MOSES LAKE — About 49% of Moses Lake residents contacted as part of a survey of community attitudes and priorities said they were satisfied with the direction of the city, with about 42% saying they thought the city was on the wrong track. The biggest concerns of survey respondents centered around homelessness and public safety. The survey was part of a larger project to get public input on possible revisions to city programs due to a deficit in the general fund. “We’re trying to understand how voters look at their values and what kinds of things you might have the opportunity to do in the future as you’re thinking about corralling this budget. Where are the opportunities, where will you find resistance and (where) will you find more agreement among voters?” said Ian Stewart, of Fulcrum Strategy group, which conducted the survey.