Friday, January 31, 2025
21.0°F

Flathead judge rejects initiative ballot request

Sam Wilson | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 8 years, 5 months AGO
by Sam Wilson
| August 24, 2016 9:40 AM

A Flathead District Court judge on Tuesday denied a request to add an anti-marijuana initiative to the November ballot, finding the initiative sponsor failed to gather enough petition signatures for the measure.

After hearing arguments and testimony on Friday, Judge Heidi Ulbricht found that Steve Zabawa, the lead sponsor for Initiative 176, did not produce enough evidence to support his claim that Flathead County election officials lost thousands of petition signatures earlier this year.

“Without the requisite number of verified signatures, the Secretary of State does not have a clear legal duty to place I-176 on the ballot,” Ulbricht wrote. “The court consequently cannot issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Secretary of State to place I-176 on the 2016 ballot.”

Initiative 176 sought to align Montana’s classification of illegal drugs with federal law, which would have effectively shut down the state’s medical marijuana program.

If the initiative could not be added to this year’s ballot, Zabawa had requested the court consider placing it on the 2018 ballot. Ulbricht also denied that request, writing in her order that no signatures had been collected for a 2018 initiative campaign.

The Montana Secretary of State’s office in July found that Initiative 176 had fallen 4,137 signatures short of the 24,175 signatures needed to be put to a statewide vote on Election Day.

Alleging that more than 3,000 signatures had been wrongly rejected by county election offices around the state and that the Flathead County Elections Department had lost another 2,588 signatures, Zabawa earlier this month asked the court for an emergency order compelling the measure’s addition to the ballot as well as another search of the Flathead County election offices.

During Friday’s hearing, Flathead County election official Monica Eisenzimer testified that she and two other county employees performed a thorough search of the office spaces used by the department once the matter was brought to her attention.

Reached by phone Wednesday, Zabawa vowed to press forward with other efforts to curtail the state’s medical marijuana program, which he believes went beyond the intent of the 2004 voter initiative that legalized the drug’s medical use in Montana.

“We’ll do everything we can to have I-182 not get passed,” he said, referring to a ballot initiative to repeal restrictions placed on the program by the 2011 Montana Legislature. “We’re not against the medical use of marijuana, we’re just against the green-card program of how to distribute it.”

He added that Safe Montana might push for a similar initiative in 2018, possibly in the form of a constitutional amendment.

Reporter Sam Wilson can be reached at 758-4407 or by email at swilson@dailyinterlake.com.

MORE IMPORTED STORIES

Initiative backer makes bid for court intervention
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 8 years, 5 months ago
Anti-marijuana group presses to add initiative to ballot
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 8 years, 5 months ago
Petitioners aim to toughen state marijuana law
Daily Inter-Lake | Updated 10 years, 7 months ago

ARTICLES BY SAM WILSON

February 24, 2016 5:37 a.m.

Filmmakers fined $5,950 for bull trout violations

The owners of a Missoula-based film company were recently  issued 38 state and 11 federal citations for violating bull trout regulations and filming illegally in the Bob Marshall Wilderness.

March 30, 2016 4:56 p.m.

Hatchery objects to Creston bottling plant

In a formal objection filed earlier this month, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service challenged the Montana Department of Natural Resources’ determination that a proposed water bottling plant in Creston would not adversely affect the nearby fish hatchery.

May 27, 2016 1:58 p.m.

Panel opposes shooting-range plan

At a packed hearing Thursday night to consider a proposed shooting range near Echo Lake, the Bigfork Land Use Advisory Committee voted unanimously in opposition to the proposal after local residents criticized its potential safety, noise and environmental impacts.