Carbon initiative could cost Grant PUD
CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 7 months AGO
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | July 15, 2016 6:00 AM
EPHRATA — A ballot initiative that would place a tax on carbon emission would cost the Grant County PUD at least $4.6 million per year at current prices for carbon offsets. And that amount would increase as carbon offset prices increase.
Carbon emissions are seen by some as a component of changing climate, and Washington residents will vote in November on an initiative that would impose a tax on emissions. Mike McClenehan of the PUD’s accounting division said state officials are working on a different plan, which would impose different operating costs in a different way. McClenehan estimated the “Clean Air Rule” would cost the PUD about $450,000 per year in its current form.
Whatever the actual facts of the case, regulators are looking at placing some kind of tax on carbon emissions, McClenehan said. Federal rules have been proposed, but have not been implemented due to pending litigation.
Commissioner Bob Bernd said commissioners should think about getting information on the impacts of the initiative out to PUD customers. “I think we want to continue to study the issue,” he said, and come up with a way to get information to customers “as the election gets closer and the arguments get more defined.”
“We should come up with a strategy as far as timing and a draft statement,” said commissioner Tom Flint. “I do think we have an obligation to our ratepayers” to inform them of the impacts, Flint said.
Most of the PUD’s power comes from hydro generation and would not be subject to taxes or the Clean Air Rule regulation. But the PUD sometimes buys electricity from other sources, and some of that would be subject to taxes or fees.
The carbon tax in Initiative 732 is supposed to be “revenue-neutral,” meaning taxes would, at least theoretically, be lowered somewhere else. If the initiative passed and the revenue-neutral provisions were implemented some of the costs to PUD customers would be offset, McClenehan said.
Bernd asked what happens if the county continues to grow and the PUD buys more power from outside the project. McClenehan replied that there are procedures in place that should keep those impacts to a minimum, at least for a while.
Cheryl Schweizer can be reached via email at [email protected].
ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER
Moses Lake officials working to correct audit issues
MOSES LAKE — Moses Lake city officials are working to correct errors identified by the Washington State Auditor’s Office and catch up on delayed audits. Municipal Finance Director Madeline Prentice said city officials are working to have the delayed audits for 2023 and 2024 submitted by May. “Trying to get caught up on the audits is our first priority,” Prentice said. “We have actually brought in an outside accounting firm to assist us with that.”
Wheeler roundabout construction scheduled for Feb 23
MOSES LAKE — If the weather cooperates, construction will begin Feb. 23 on a roundabout at the intersection of Road L Northeast and East Wheeler Road. Moses Lake’s financial contribution to the project is about $81,000. Contributions by other stakeholders in the project was not immediately available.
Moses Lake residents asked to weigh in on financial priorities
MOSES LAKE — With the Moses Lake City Council working on a financial plan that will require what council member Jeremy Davis said will be hard decisions, city officials want to hear which services residents think are the most important.