Carbon initiative could cost Grant PUD
CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 4 months AGO
CBH Columbia Basin Herald Local News
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | July 15, 2016 6:00 AM
EPHRATA — A ballot initiative that would place a tax on carbon emission would cost the Grant County PUD at least $4.6 million per year at current prices for carbon offsets. And that amount would increase as carbon offset prices increase.
Carbon emissions are seen by some as a component of changing climate, and Washington residents will vote in November on an initiative that would impose a tax on emissions. Mike McClenehan of the PUD’s accounting division said state officials are working on a different plan, which would impose different operating costs in a different way. McClenehan estimated the “Clean Air Rule” would cost the PUD about $450,000 per year in its current form.
Whatever the actual facts of the case, regulators are looking at placing some kind of tax on carbon emissions, McClenehan said. Federal rules have been proposed, but have not been implemented due to pending litigation.
Commissioner Bob Bernd said commissioners should think about getting information on the impacts of the initiative out to PUD customers. “I think we want to continue to study the issue,” he said, and come up with a way to get information to customers “as the election gets closer and the arguments get more defined.”
“We should come up with a strategy as far as timing and a draft statement,” said commissioner Tom Flint. “I do think we have an obligation to our ratepayers” to inform them of the impacts, Flint said.
Most of the PUD’s power comes from hydro generation and would not be subject to taxes or the Clean Air Rule regulation. But the PUD sometimes buys electricity from other sources, and some of that would be subject to taxes or fees.
The carbon tax in Initiative 732 is supposed to be “revenue-neutral,” meaning taxes would, at least theoretically, be lowered somewhere else. If the initiative passed and the revenue-neutral provisions were implemented some of the costs to PUD customers would be offset, McClenehan said.
Bernd asked what happens if the county continues to grow and the PUD buys more power from outside the project. McClenehan replied that there are procedures in place that should keep those impacts to a minimum, at least for a while.
Cheryl Schweizer can be reached via email at [email protected].
ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER
Moses Lake School District, teachers union reach tentative agreement
MOSES LAKE — The Moses Lake Education Association announced late Friday night that the union has reached a tentative agreement with the Moses Lake School District. Classes will resume Monday, according to a press release from the MLEA.
Priest Rapids Dam oil spill still in cleanup stage
MATTAWA — People downstream of Priest Rapids Dam are being asked to look for evidence of oil on the waters of the Columbia River following a spill of mineral oil at the dam Wednesday. Department of Ecology officials are asking boaters to stay off the river between Priest Rapids and Pasco while crews work to clean up the oil, according to a PUD press release. Absorbent booms were put in the water to collect the oil downstream of the dam and are still there, said Christine Pratt, public information officer with the Grant County PUD, in the PUD press release. The booms will stay there until the Department of Ecology allows their removal.
Royal SD voters to decide on educational programs and operations levy in February
ROYAL CITY — Royal School District voters will be asked to accept or reject a two-year educational programs and operations levy request in a special election Feb. 10. If it’s approved, it would replace the district’s existing levy approved by voters in 2024. Royal Superintendent Roger Trail said the levy rate would remain unchanged.