Carbon initiative could cost Grant PUD
CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 7 months AGO
CBH Columbia Basin Herald Local News
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | July 15, 2016 6:00 AM
EPHRATA — A ballot initiative that would place a tax on carbon emission would cost the Grant County PUD at least $4.6 million per year at current prices for carbon offsets. And that amount would increase as carbon offset prices increase.
Carbon emissions are seen by some as a component of changing climate, and Washington residents will vote in November on an initiative that would impose a tax on emissions. Mike McClenehan of the PUD’s accounting division said state officials are working on a different plan, which would impose different operating costs in a different way. McClenehan estimated the “Clean Air Rule” would cost the PUD about $450,000 per year in its current form.
Whatever the actual facts of the case, regulators are looking at placing some kind of tax on carbon emissions, McClenehan said. Federal rules have been proposed, but have not been implemented due to pending litigation.
Commissioner Bob Bernd said commissioners should think about getting information on the impacts of the initiative out to PUD customers. “I think we want to continue to study the issue,” he said, and come up with a way to get information to customers “as the election gets closer and the arguments get more defined.”
“We should come up with a strategy as far as timing and a draft statement,” said commissioner Tom Flint. “I do think we have an obligation to our ratepayers” to inform them of the impacts, Flint said.
Most of the PUD’s power comes from hydro generation and would not be subject to taxes or the Clean Air Rule regulation. But the PUD sometimes buys electricity from other sources, and some of that would be subject to taxes or fees.
The carbon tax in Initiative 732 is supposed to be “revenue-neutral,” meaning taxes would, at least theoretically, be lowered somewhere else. If the initiative passed and the revenue-neutral provisions were implemented some of the costs to PUD customers would be offset, McClenehan said.
Bernd asked what happens if the county continues to grow and the PUD buys more power from outside the project. McClenehan replied that there are procedures in place that should keep those impacts to a minimum, at least for a while.
Cheryl Schweizer can be reached via email at [email protected].
ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER
New Samaritan Hospital opens its doors
MOSES LAKE — The tarp covering the “Emergency” sign at the new Samaritan Hospital could be removed a few minutes early, but it wasn’t officially open until the sign’s lighting was turned on. The timing had to be precise. “I’ve got to wait until 6:59 (a.m.),” said Jason Wilbur of Graham Construction.
Coolidge Rd. extension to improve access to Moses Lake Community Health
MOSES LAKE — Construction is scheduled to be completed in late April on a project to extend South Coolidge Street to connect it with East Wheeler Road. The goal, said Moses Lake Community Health Center Sheila Berschauer, is to improve access MLCHC.
With fewer applicants, Grant PUD trying to fill what’s left
EPHRATA — A steep increase in application fees for Grant County PUD customers has reduced the number of pending applications dramatically. Andy Wendell, vice-president of customer experience, said that was one of the goals, but there were others. “There were a number of things that we wanted to do. We wanted to become contemporary. What I mean by that is that we (want to) have application processes that are providing certainty in our queue,” Wendell said. “(We wanted to ensure) that when we dedicate engineering and planning staff to reviewing applications, we want to increase the probability that we're working on applications that are going to come to fruition as much as possible. So yes, we did achieve results that we had hoped for, which is to have applicants in the queue that are more certain (to) come to fruition.”