Monday, March 30, 2026
36.0°F

Carbon initiative could cost Grant PUD

CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 9 years, 8 months AGO
by CHERYL SCHWEIZERStaff Writer
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | July 15, 2016 6:00 AM

EPHRATA — A ballot initiative that would place a tax on carbon emission would cost the Grant County PUD at least $4.6 million per year at current prices for carbon offsets. And that amount would increase as carbon offset prices increase.

Carbon emissions are seen by some as a component of changing climate, and Washington residents will vote in November on an initiative that would impose a tax on emissions. Mike McClenehan of the PUD’s accounting division said state officials are working on a different plan, which would impose different operating costs in a different way. McClenehan estimated the “Clean Air Rule” would cost the PUD about $450,000 per year in its current form.

Whatever the actual facts of the case, regulators are looking at placing some kind of tax on carbon emissions, McClenehan said. Federal rules have been proposed, but have not been implemented due to pending litigation.

Commissioner Bob Bernd said commissioners should think about getting information on the impacts of the initiative out to PUD customers. “I think we want to continue to study the issue,” he said, and come up with a way to get information to customers “as the election gets closer and the arguments get more defined.”

“We should come up with a strategy as far as timing and a draft statement,” said commissioner Tom Flint. “I do think we have an obligation to our ratepayers” to inform them of the impacts, Flint said.

Most of the PUD’s power comes from hydro generation and would not be subject to taxes or the Clean Air Rule regulation. But the PUD sometimes buys electricity from other sources, and some of that would be subject to taxes or fees.

The carbon tax in Initiative 732 is supposed to be “revenue-neutral,” meaning taxes would, at least theoretically, be lowered somewhere else. If the initiative passed and the revenue-neutral provisions were implemented some of the costs to PUD customers would be offset, McClenehan said.

Bernd asked what happens if the county continues to grow and the PUD buys more power from outside the project. McClenehan replied that there are procedures in place that should keep those impacts to a minimum, at least for a while.

Cheryl Schweizer can be reached via email at [email protected].

ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER

REC Silicon reports operating loss in 2025
March 30, 2026 2:20 a.m.

REC Silicon reports operating loss in 2025

MOSES LAKE — REC Silicon operating revenue dropped substantially in 2025 when compared with 2024, according to the company’s annual report released March 25. The company reported $78.2 million in operating revenue in 2025, compared with $140.8 million in 2024.

Open house for Moses Lake comprehensive plan Monday
March 28, 2026 1:36 p.m.

Open house for Moses Lake comprehensive plan Monday

MOSES LAKE — Moses Lake residents are being invited to learn more about and give their opinions on proposed updates to sections of the city’s comprehensive plan at an open house Monday at the Moses Lake Civic Center, 411 S. Balsam St.

Samaritan posts operating loss for first two months of 2026
March 27, 2026 3 a.m.

Samaritan posts operating loss for first two months of 2026

MOSES LAKE — Samaritan Healthcare posted net revenue losses in January and February, and while hospital officials anticipated some red ink, the losses were larger than the budget projections. Samaritan posted an operating loss of about $1.4 million in February and about $486,500 in January.