Thanks to Jack DeBaun for bringing up several of the many fallacious arguments commonly used by climate change fanatics.

First, he insists that climate change is not theory, but fact. But the real fact is that climate change is a relatively new field of study, still in its infant stages and by no means a fully-developed science. Though he references Tyndall’s studies in 1859, DeBaun fails to note that 19th century scientists had primitive concepts of elemental gases which have long since been debunked by modern science.

Second, Mr. DeBaun fails to note that the “many thousands of empirical data points” he refers to have been “adjusted” (falsified) to agree with or conform to climate science’s presupposed climate models.

Third, Mr. Debaun essentially defeats his own argument against “laboratory-like conditions” by making reference to volcanos. Volcanos can, in fact, be directly observed and studied empirically (hence, laboratory-like conditions), whereas future climactic events that have yet to happen cannot. Real volcanos actually exist in the here and now, but the climate of the future does not yet exist. That is why so much of modern climate “science” is nothing more than mere speculation. (Incidentally, volcanos actually do more damage to our environment than all of the world’s industrial activities put together!)

A return to logic and reason is the only thing that can save us from the gloom and doom predictions of pseudo-science and climate change fanaticism.

MONTE HEIL

Sagle