I-185 is a bad deal for Montanans
Daniel Zolnikov | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 6 years, 3 months AGO
Initiative 185 is a bad deal for Montana that voters should reject. The winners of this bad deal would be the hospitals and their wealthy executives. The losers would be the rest of us: veterans, the middle-class, tobacco consumers and most of all, people who want to quit smoking. It’s a costly idea with almost no upside.
Like most bad deals, you have to read the fine print to understand it doesn’t deliver on its promises. For example, read the fine print about big promises to veterans. The people behind I-185 promise money for veterans’ services, including veterans’ nursing homes and suicide prevention. What they don’t say is that the measure caps funding for veterans’ services support at just four percent of new revenue — a drop in the bucket. It is shameless how I-185 is waving the pro-veteran flag to market the campaign while appropriating such a small amount to veterans.
They also make big promises about preventing kids from smoking and helping smokers quit. Get out your reading glasses and check the fine print. I-185 dedicates a mere six percent of new revenue to smoking prevention and cessation programs — another drop in a very large bucket.
Despite the promises made, most of the money from I-185 would not go toward improving health care access for Montanans. According to the Initiative, only 44 percent of new revenues would be earmarked for health and Medicaid programs.
A Governor’s Office of Budget and Program Planning analysis projects that more than half of the new money from I-185 would go into the General Fund and existing programs.
As for the overblown promise to help people quit smoking, I-185 would force them to pay an enormous new tax of 83 percent on vaping products, which have been identified as a potential way to help smokers quit. I have friends who quit smoking by using vaping products. That’s not just a bad deal for people who struggle to quit smoking. It’s counterproductive.
Since the state Legislature passed Medicaid Expansion in 2015, here’s what we’ve learned: The program has cost taxpayers nearly double what experts projected. The original estimated cost for Medicaid Expansion was $43 million. The actual price was reported as $70 million. With health care costs expected to rise across the nation, that price tag will only get bigger.
The real winners of this bad deal are wealthy hospital corporations that would directly benefit from I-185. The president of one of Montana’s largest hospital chains made more than $7 million in 2016. And a dozen other hospital executives made more than a million dollars. Montana’s Medicaid Expansion was intended to help those in need – not millionaires.
Perhaps the worst part of I-185 is that it bypasses the Legislature’s plans to evaluate Medicaid expansion and locks the program in place without much-needed cost controls or reforms. Instead of allowing for legislative oversight, I-185 creates a permanent spending appropriation for the Montana Department of Public Health, which experts warn violates the state’s constitution.
Montana’s Medicaid Expansion program has serious flaws that must be addressed before it is made permanent. Vote NO on 1-185.
Daniel Zolnikov is a Republican member of Montana House of Representatives representing District 45.
ARTICLES BY DANIEL ZOLNIKOV
Scope of rural broadband gap
Policymakers at the state and federal level have been working for years to improve access to broadband-quality across the country. It’s a difficult problem, especially in states with predominately rural populations. While internet service providers in Montana have made large investments in building out broadband infrastructure, and have succeeded in providing access to many rural Montanans, we are still a long way off from achieving the Federal Communications Commission’s stated goal of eliminating the rural broadband gap.
Montana left footing the bill for real environmental stewardship
Under President Trump we have seen a sudden resurgence of federalism on the left in American politics as liberal states like California seek to go their own way on issues like the Paris Climate Accord and sanctuary cities. But sometimes these states’ attempt to set policy within their own borders has a very real negative impact on neighboring states.
Prescribing the illness for the cure
Years before the 2008 financial crisis, economists and policy analysts began to sound alarm bells that we were headed for a financial crisis as a result of government debt spiraling out of control. We know now that they were right to urge caution, and today every American is painfully aware of the financial situation in our country, and the incredible damage that can be done in countries like Greece that allow their government deficits to grow irresponsibly large.