Arguments that ignore contradictory evidence are logically flawed

Monte Heil (Daily Bee, Feb. 1, 2022) prefers the “common sense philosophy of Thomas Reid” for evaluating the authenticity of scientific hypotheses. However, reality often defies common sense. For example, rapidly moving measuring sticks are shorter relative to stationary ones. Time literally passes more slowly on the International Space Station than it does on Earth. Rotating masses twist space-time around them. Solid objects are composed mostly of empty space. An electron can be in many different places simultaneously. Two entangled particles can be separated by vast distances, yet measurement of one instantaneously determines the status of the other. (Search “How Einstein’s general theory of relativity killed off common-sense physics” and “10 mind-boggling things you should know about quantum physics”)

Common sense once led people to believe the Earth was flat and unmovable at the center of the cosmos. It is woefully inadequate for assessing the validity of counter-intuitive scientific discoveries. “Common sense is a collection of prejudices acquired by age 18.” -Albert Einstein

Mr. Heil apparently understands the importance of evidence. He presented multiple lines of evidence to argue that I exist. Yet he ignores growing evidence that anthropogenic global warming has detrimental consequences and argues that those who are concerned about them are “alarmists” and “fanatics.” Arguments that ignore contradictory evidence are logically flawed. (Search “invincible ignorance fallacy”)

JACK DeBAUN

Dover