Sunday, December 14, 2025
28.0°F

Kootenai County commissioners reject cell tower

KAYE THORNBRUGH | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 2 years, 10 months AGO
by KAYE THORNBRUGH
Kaye Thornbrugh is a second-generation Kootenai County resident who has been with the Coeur d’Alene Press for six years. She primarily covers Kootenai County’s government, as well as law enforcement, the legal system and North Idaho College. | January 27, 2023 1:09 AM

COEUR d’ALENE — Kootenai County commissioners voted 2-1 Thursday to nix a cell tower off Potlatch Hill Road, reversing their previous decision to approve it.

The board made a split decision last October to approve a conditional-use permit for landowner Thomas Ingle, AT&T and SmartLink to build a “wireless communications facility to provide the latest 5G and 4G LTE technology.” AT&T asserted that the tower would increase the coverage area by 20 miles.

Community members provided overwhelmingly negative feedback about the proposed 150-foot lattice tower, which would be built on what is currently vacant land within the city of Coeur d’Alene. A group of 47 Kootenai County residents requested the reconsideration.

“We’re happy that the commissioners heard what we all had to say,” said Steve Petroskie, who lives near the site of the proposed tower. “We know this is a short-term win because AT&T will be back. But it’s good to know that, for now, the citizens were listened to.”

The most frequent concern cited by residents was about the potential for lightning strikes, while others objected to the visual impact of the tower and theorized about health risks.

Commissioner Bill Brooks voted to approve the cell tower last year, while Leslie Duncan opposed it. This time, recently elected Commissioner Bruce Mattare cast the deciding vote.

“I did not believe that the applicant sufficiently proved they were filling gaps in cell service to satisfy constituency,” Mattare said.

Brooks reaffirmed his original vote, maintaining that he’s unconvinced the tower would increase the risk of fires beyond what already exists. He added that he found no evidence that cell towers cause adverse health effects.

“Everything else I heard during both hearings was anecdotal and I don’t make decisions based on anecdotes,” Brooks said.

Jonathan Gillham, the county’s communications coordinator, said the applicant has recourse.

“They may choose to sue in civil court,” he said Thursday.

Whatever the future holds, Petroskie said that for now, the neighbors who rallied against the tower will celebrate the county’s decision.

“It was a long and arduous process,” he said. “But the most important thing we got out of it is that the community is even stronger than it’s ever been.”

photo

Bruce E. Mattare

ARTICLES BY KAYE THORNBRUGH

Citylink’s future in question
December 14, 2025 1:09 a.m.

Citylink’s future in question

Kootenai County commissioner: 'We don't need it'

Amid discussions this week between county, city and tribal representatives about the future of their Citylink partnership, two commissioners questioned whether Kootenai County should operate a public transit program at all.

Super 1, Peirone Produce share the love — and potatoes
December 13, 2025 1:08 a.m.

Super 1, Peirone Produce share the love — and potatoes

4,000 pounds of spuds given out

Even before he encouraged them to help themselves to a free bag of potatoes or two, Super 1 shoppers didn’t hesitate to greet Ron McIntire with smiles and hugs Thursday morning.

Sheriff Norris revokes special deputy status of Cd’A, Rathdrum police chiefs
December 11, 2025 1:09 a.m.

Sheriff Norris revokes special deputy status of Cd’A, Rathdrum police chiefs

Chief White says Norris retaliated after town hall investigation

Chief White says Norris retaliated after town hall investigation