Thursday, July 23, 2026
62.0°F

Newhouse, colleagues introduce infrastructure bill

NANCE BESTON | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 7 months, 2 weeks AGO
by NANCE BESTON
Staff Writer | December 4, 2025 4:55 PM

WASHINGTON D.C. — On Nov. 21, 2025, a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers introduced the Urban Canal Modernization Act, HR 6279, aimed at addressing the deteriorating condition of urban canal infrastructure across the country. This legislation, sponsored by Representatives Dan Newhouse, R-Washington; Mike Simpson, R-Idaho;  Adam Gray, D-California; and Russ Fulcher, R-Idaho, focuses on providing federal support for the extraordinary operation and maintenance of urban canals deemed to be at significant risk of failure.

“As communities in Grant County and elsewhere face serious risks from aging canal systems, it is imperative that we act now to ensure vital water infrastructure is maintained and upgraded,” Newhouse wrote in a statement. “The Bureau of Reclamation’s canals are in dire need of repairs, and the surrounding communities that rely on them would be at risk if they were to fail. This legislation provides local authorities with additional resources to manage these critical pieces of infrastructure while protecting the people and property around canals of concern.”

The introduction of this bill comes in response to increasing pressures on urban canal systems that have not kept pace with population growth and infrastructure demands, Newhouse said in a statement. The Urban Canal Modernization Act modifies the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to clarify the definition and accountability measures for “urban canals of concern,” which includes those areas where a failure would pose significant risks to lives and property.

According to the bill, an urban canal of concern is defined as a canal reach that could risk the lives of more than 100 individuals or lead to property damage exceeding $5 million. Furthermore, the Secretary of the Interior is tasked with determining whether a canal requires extraordinary maintenance based on guidelines established by the Bureau of Reclamation.

In discussions surrounding the Act, Simpson talked about the importance of addressing these pressing infrastructure challenges.

“We must act to protect Idahoans and Westerners’ way of life. The substantial urban growth around irrigation canals has created challenges and poses a threat to nearby communities,” he wrote in a statement. “The Urban Canal Modernization Act does just that by maintaining safety, expanding accessibility, and providing additional tools to ensure these crucial repairs get completed.”

Urban canals play a vital role in American agriculture and are essential for irrigation, drinking water supply, and recreation. However, many existing systems are more than a century old and require significant repairs to meet contemporary demands, according to a statement from Newhouse.

“California’s population has more than doubled since the mid-20th century, yet our water capacity hasn’t expanded to meet the needs of our communities,” Gray wrote. “The federal government must invest in our existing water systems to reduce costs for water users and farmers. The bipartisan Urban Canal Modernization Act would rebuild crumbling, outdated water infrastructure in the Valley to bring us into the 21st century.”

The proposed legislation also introduces a funding mechanism where 35% of the costs for extraordinary maintenance on urban canals will be provided by federal funds on a non-reimbursable basis. This funding model aims to alleviate the financial burden on local authorities responsible for maintaining aging canal structures.

Fulcher emphasized the importance of updating these vital irrigation systems.

“Urban canals are vital to agricultural, irrigation, and the water needs of our communities. Yet much of this critical infrastructure is in urgent need of repair,” he wrote in a statement. “The Urban Canal Modernization Act is a common-sense solution to help address these challenges and ensure our canals in Idaho and across the country get the updates they need.”

The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources, where it will undergo further deliberation.

ARTICLES BY NANCE BESTON

Grant County Sheriff candidates discuss transparency, trust
July 23, 2026 3:40 a.m.

Grant County Sheriff candidates discuss transparency, trust

EPHRATA — As Grant County voters prepare to submit their primary ballots, three candidates are vying for the position as Grant County Sheriff including incumbent Joey Kriete and challengers Josh Sainsbury and Darrick Gregg are competing in the upcoming primary election. To help readers compare the candidates' priorities, qualifications and plans for the office, each was asked the same question and given an equal opportunity to respond.

Grant County Commissioner candidates deliberate fiscal responsibility, budgeting
July 23, 2026 3:05 a.m.

Grant County Commissioner candidates deliberate fiscal responsibility, budgeting

EPHRATA — Four Republicans are seeking election to Grant County Commissioner Position 3 in the upcoming primary: Shannon Durfee, Kelly Raap, Seth Weeks and Janice Flynn. To give voters a clear comparison of the candidates' positions and priorities, each was asked the same set of questions and provided the same deadline to respond. Durfee, Raap and Flynn submitted responses by the deadline; Weeks did not respond.

Sheriff candidates discuss staffing, retention
July 22, 2026 3 a.m.

Sheriff candidates discuss staffing, retention

EPHRATA — As Grant County voters prepare to select their next sheriff, incumbent Joey Kriete and challengers Josh Sainsbury and Darrick Gregg are competing in the upcoming primary election. To help readers compare the candidates' priorities, qualifications and plans for the office, each was asked the same question and given an equal opportunity to respond. This installment focuses on one of the most pressing challenges facing law enforcement agencies: recruiting, retaining and supporting qualified staff within the Grant County Sheriff's Office.