ADVERTISING: ADVERTORIAL — Seven critical considerations before naming minors as estate beneficiaries in Idaho

Many parents and grandparents naturally want to leave assets directly to their children or grandchildren. However, naming minor children as direct beneficiaries in your estate plan can create significant complications. Before you finalize those beneficiary designations, here are seven important factors every Idaho resident should consider. 

1. Minors Cannot Legally Own Property 

In most jurisdictions, individuals under 18 cannot legally own substantial assets or manage property in their own names. If a minor receives an inheritance directly, a court must appoint a conservator to manage those assets until the child reaches adulthood. This court-supervised process is expensive, time-consuming, and entirely avoidable with proper planning. 

2. Court Supervision Means Less Control 

When a minor inherits assets directly, Idaho courts will oversee how that money is managed and spent. The appointed conservator must regularly report to the court, seek approval for certain expenditures, and follow strict rules about investments. This oversight continues until the child turns 18, creating ongoing legal fees and administrative burdens that reduce the inheritance itself. 

3. The Age 18 Problem 

Perhaps the biggest concern: when the conservatorship ends at age 18, the child receives the entire inheritance outright with no strings attached. Most parents would agree that an 18-year-old may not be financially mature enough to handle a substantial inheritance responsibly. Direct beneficiary designations offer no protection against poor decisions at this vulnerable age. 

4. Special Needs Considerations 

If a minor beneficiary has special needs or may qualify for government benefits like Medicaid or SSI in the future, a direct inheritance could disqualify them from these crucial programs. Idaho law allows for special needs trusts that can provide for a child's supplemental needs while preserving eligibility for public benefits, but only if you plan ahead. 

5. Family Dynamics and Fairness 

Consider how direct inheritances to minors might affect family relationships. If one child is significantly younger than others, court-required conservatorship for that child means different distribution timelines and potentially unequal net inheritances due to legal fees, or increases to value over time if assets are invested. Additionally, in blended families, these issues become even more complex. 

6. Protection from Creditors and Divorce 

Assets held in trust for minors receive significantly better protection than direct inheritances. If a young adult beneficiary faces a lawsuit, divorce, or creditor claims shortly after receiving an inheritance at 18, those assets are vulnerable. A properly structured trust can protect your legacy from these risks while still benefiting your intended beneficiaries. 

7. Tax and Investment Management 

Minor beneficiaries cannot make investment decisions or handle tax matters. While a conservator can manage these issues, trusts typically offer more flexibility and better long-term tax planning opportunities. Idaho's Uniform Prudent Investor Act provides trustees with broader authority to invest and grow assets for minors than conservators typically have. 

Better Alternatives 

Rather than naming minors directly as beneficiaries, consider these Idaho-friendly options: 

Revocable Living Trusts allow you to specify exactly when and how minors receive inheritances, choose trusted individuals to manage assets, and avoid court involvement entirely. 

Minor's Trusts under the Idaho Uniform Transfers to Minors Act provide a simpler alternative for smaller inheritances, allowing assets to be managed until age 25. 

Testamentary Trusts created through your will can provide similar protections, though they still require probate (meaning a revocable living trust may be the better approach). 

The right strategy depends on your family's unique circumstances, the size of potential inheritances, and your goals for how you want to provide for the next generation. 

Don't let good intentions create unnecessary complications. While it's natural to want to provide for children and grandchildren, direct beneficiary designations for minors rarely serve families well. Taking time now to structure your estate plan properly will ensure your legacy benefits your loved ones without court interference, excessive costs, or premature distributions. 

If you're considering naming minors as beneficiaries in your Idaho estate plan, consult with an experienced estate planning attorney who can help you explore alternatives that better protect both your assets and your beneficiaries' futures.  

My law firm is currently offering free telephonic, electronic, or in-person consultations concerning adult guardianships, probates, and creating or reviewing estate planning documents.   

• • •

Robert J. Green is an Estate Planning, Probate, Elder Law, Trust, & Guardianship Attorney and the owner of Kootenai Law Group, PLLC in Coeur d’Alene. If you have questions about estate planning, probates, wills, trusts, powers of attorney, guardianships, Medicaid planning, or VA Benefit planning, contact Kootenai Law at 208-765-6555, [email protected], or visit www.KootenaiLaw.com.  

This has been presented as general information and not as legal advice. Do not engage in legal decision-making without the advice of a competent attorney after discussion of your specific circumstances.