LAKELAND: Still worried a year later

This week marks one year since I resigned from the Lakeland School District with no job prospects. It also marks the first time I worked through spring break after 12 years in education — and I didn’t miss it. That realization caused me to reflect on why.

I didn’t leave because of students. I left because the environment changed. Over time, creativity in the classroom was replaced with compliance. Teachers were required to seek approval for certain instructional materials, including videos longer than five minutes. In a government class, the ability to quickly incorporate current events is essential. When sharing timely content requires additional approval, it becomes harder to respond to what is happening in the world and connect learning to real-life civic issues.

Administrators who once supported teachers increasingly had to weigh decisions against board expectations. The focus shifted from supporting classrooms to avoiding conflict. Over time, morale declined and the school environment suffered.

Since my departure, the district has experienced additional instability, including leadership turnover, budget cuts following a failed levy and new requests for community funding. These developments affect more than staff; they influence student experiences and public trust.

School board decisions shape the direction of a district. When those decisions create uncertainty, the ripple effects reach classrooms, families and taxpayers.

A recall effort is underway. After reflecting on my experience and the direction of the district, I support the recall effort and the opportunity for new leadership on the school board. I encourage community members to consider whether current leadership is restoring stability and supporting students and educators.

Our students and community deserve strong leadership.

SHANDA HEACOCK

Athol