Ephrata to consider impact fees for new development
CHERYL SCHWEIZER | Hagadone News Network | UPDATED 4 hours, 34 minutes AGO
Senior Reporter Cheryl Schweizer is a journalist with more than 30 years of experience serving small communities in the Pacific Northwest. She began her post-high-school education at Treasure Valley Community College and enerned her journalism degree at Oregon State University. After working for multiple publications, she has settled down at the Columbia Basin Herald and has been a staple of the newsroom for more than a decade. Schweizer’s dedication to her communities and profession has earned her the nickname “The Baroness of Bylines.” She covers a variety of beats including health, business and various municipalities. | April 18, 2026 1:14 PM
EPHRATA — The possibility of adding transportation and parks impact fees for new development will be under consideration by the Ephrata City Council, starting with a discussion April 29.
Community Development Director Ron Sell said development fees would be a new thing for Ephrata.
“Currently we don’t have any impact fees in place. We do have a parks mitigation fee in place,” Sell said.
City officials commissioned a study from SCJ Alliance, Spokane, to take an in-depth look at the city’s options. Cities do have the ability to levy fees on new residential and commercial development for some city services, including streets and parks, to help pay for the impacts that growth brings.
Ephrata is growing and is projected to keep growing – Ephrata may have about 10,800 people by 2044, according to the city’s comprehensive plan.
The city has a list of parks facility capital projects with possible construction dates through 2037. They range from the current project at the sports complex to upgrades at the Splash Zone to a Beazley Hill trail. Also on the list are improvements at Oasis Park and to the skate park, among other projects.
The total estimated cost for all projects is about $8 million, the SCJ report said. As of now, the city would be eligible for outside funding for about $1.4 million for those projects. The park impact fee would help pay a portion of the remaining cost.
The city also would be eligible for some – but not much – outside funding for its transportation projects. The current list of proposed transportation projects includes the possibility of new streets. Other possible projects include work on Division Avenue East and Alder Street Northwest, as well as extension of Nat Washington Way.
Total cost of the proposed road projects was estimated at about $38.8 million; as of now, the estimate for potential outside funding for street projects would be about $500,000, the SCJ report said.
Representatives from SCJ will talk about their findings with the council at the April 29 meeting. Council meetings begin at 6 p.m.
ARTICLES BY CHERYL SCHWEIZER
Moses Lake Grange to sponsor candidate forum
MOSES LAKE — The Moses Lake Grange No. 1151 will sponsor a forum where people can listen to candidates for the Fourth Congressional District from 3 to 5 p.m. May 9 at the Grange building, 14724 Road 3 SE.
Ephrata to consider impact fees for new development
EPHRATA — The possibility of adding transportation and parks impact fees for new development will be under consideration by the Ephrata City Council, starting with a discussion April 29. Community Development Director Ron Sell said development fees would be a new thing for Ephrata. “Currently we don’t have any impact fees in place. We do have a parks mitigation fee in place,” Sell said.
Surveys of Moses Lake residents show attitudes toward service cuts, sales tax increase
MOSES LAKE — About 49% of Moses Lake residents contacted as part of a survey of community attitudes and priorities said they were satisfied with the direction of the city, with about 42% saying they thought the city was on the wrong track. The biggest concerns of survey respondents centered around homelessness and public safety. The survey was part of a larger project to get public input on possible revisions to city programs due to a deficit in the general fund. “We’re trying to understand how voters look at their values and what kinds of things you might have the opportunity to do in the future as you’re thinking about corralling this budget. Where are the opportunities, where will you find resistance and (where) will you find more agreement among voters?” said Ian Stewart, of Fulcrum Strategy group, which conducted the survey.